wheel My order
Mon-Sun 9am-7pm
704 755 4566
Charlotte, NC
wheel My order
Home / Insights /

Acura vs Ford Reliability

Nearly a tie: Acura averages 59/100 vs Ford at 58/100 across 655 real pre-purchase inspections (89 Acura / 566 Ford). 52% of Acuras and 51% of Fords scored 60/100 or higher. The average car we check scores 61/100.

vs
Head to head
AcuraFord
Cars inspected89566
Average condition59/10058/100
In good shape (60+/100)52%51%
Holds up to (avg dips below decent)~115k mi~127k mi
Repainted or replaced panel80%70%
Structural repair found6%4%
Fault codes recently cleared31%24%

Green = the better number of the pair. Condition reflects the mix of cars that came to us — age, price, model — so treat small gaps as a tie.

How they score
Acura
Excellent 28% Good 24% Mediocre 22% Poor 26%
Ford
Excellent 23% Good 28% Mediocre 24% Poor 25%
How long do they stay good?
Good cars by mileage
▬ Acura▬ Ford▬ all cars
0 25 50 75 100 Acura, 20–40k mi: 100%, drawn from the nearby bands (14 cars in this band)Acura, 40–60k mi: 83%, drawn from the nearby bands (6 cars in this band)Acura, 60–80k mi: 67%, drawn from the nearby bands (10 cars in this band)Acura, 80–100k mi: 56%, drawn from the nearby bands (9 cars in this band)Acura, 100–120k mi: 39%, drawn from the nearby bands (7 cars in this band)Acura, 120–140k mi: 33% in good shape (21 cars)Acura, 160–180k mi: 27%, drawn from the nearby bands (11 cars in this band) Ford, 0–20k mi: 88% in good shape (25 cars)Ford, 20–40k mi: 87% in good shape (45 cars)Ford, 40–60k mi: 83% in good shape (65 cars)Ford, 60–80k mi: 66% in good shape (59 cars)Ford, 80–100k mi: 59% in good shape (69 cars)Ford, 100–120k mi: 41% in good shape (80 cars)Ford, 120–140k mi: 46% in good shape (57 cars)Ford, 140–160k mi: 21% in good shape (48 cars)Ford, 160–180k mi: 38% in good shape (34 cars)Ford, 180–200k mi: 22% in good shape (27 cars)Ford, 200–220k mi: 13% in good shape (23 cars) 40k 80k 120k 160k 200k mileage when we inspected it
Good cars by age
▬ Acura▬ Ford▬ all cars
0 25 50 75 100 Acura, 2 years old: 94%, drawn from the nearby bands (8 cars this age)Acura, 4 years old: 77%, drawn from the nearby bands (6 cars this age)Acura, 7 years old: 66%, drawn from the nearby bands (6 cars this age)Acura, 9 years old: 54%, drawn from the nearby bands (6 cars this age)Acura, 10 years old: 53%, drawn from the nearby bands (7 cars this age)Acura, 12 years old: 31%, drawn from the nearby bands (7 cars this age) Ford, 1 years old: 95%, drawn from the nearby bands (18 cars this age)Ford, 2 years old: 96% in good shape (23 cars)Ford, 3 years old: 93% in good shape (30 cars)Ford, 4 years old: 78% in good shape (45 cars)Ford, 5 years old: 71% in good shape (38 cars)Ford, 6 years old: 62% in good shape (45 cars)Ford, 7 years old: 63% in good shape (46 cars)Ford, 8 years old: 37% in good shape (49 cars)Ford, 9 years old: 37% in good shape (46 cars)Ford, 10 years old: 58% in good shape (33 cars)Ford, 11 years old: 54% in good shape (24 cars)Ford, 12 years old: 40% in good shape (30 cars)Ford, 13 years old: 31% in good shape (16 cars)Ford, 14 years old: 33%, drawn from the nearby bands (19 cars this age)Ford, 15 years old: 32%, drawn from the nearby bands (17 cars this age)Ford, 16 years old: 24%, drawn from the nearby bands (12 cars this age) 2y 4y 6y 8y 10y 12y 14y 16y vehicle age when we inspected it

Share in good shape (scoring 60+/100) by mileage and by age when we inspected them (each dot ≥5 cars; a band under 20 cars follows the nearby bands, so a run above the all-cars line stays above it, and a band of 20 or more uses the rate we measured; where a band has too few cars, the line follows the trend between the bands on either side; rolled-back odometers excluded from the mileage curve). Dashed grey = all cars we check.

Most common faults
Acura
Oil leaks · Engine
56%
Fuel trim out of range · Engine
51%
Tires condition & wear · Brakes and tires
46%
Active error codes · Electronic equipment
28%
Fluid leaks · Steering (hydraulic power)
22%
Ford
Oil leaks · Engine
57%
Tires condition & wear · Brakes and tires
38%
Fuel trim out of range · Engine
30%
Active error codes · Electronic equipment
30%
Oil leaks · Drivetrain
20%
Trajectory by generation
Acura

Not enough Acuras at the 5–10 year checkpoint yet to draw a generation trend.

Ford ▲ Newer Fords are holding up better 40% 60% 80% 2012–14: 41% in good shape (age-adjusted; 37 cars, raw 38%) 41 2015–17: 53% in good shape (age-adjusted; 99 cars, raw 49%) 53 2018–20: 59% in good shape (age-adjusted; 94 cars, raw 64%) 59 2009–11 2012–14 2015–17 2018–20 2021+

Share in good shape when inspected at the same age (5–10 years, age-adjusted), by model-year generation; dashed = all-brand average. All brands →

FAQ
?
Which is more reliable, Acura or Ford?
Nearly a tie: Acura averages 59/100 vs Ford at 58/100 across 655 real pre-purchase inspections (89 Acura / 566 Ford). 52% of Acuras and 51% of Fords scored 60/100 or higher.
?
What are the most common problems with used Acuras and Fords?
On Acuras we flag oil leaks (56%), fuel trim out of range (51%), tires condition & wear (46%). On Fords: oil leaks (57%), tires condition & wear (38%), fuel trim out of range (30%).
?
How many Acura and Ford vehicles have you inspected?
89 Acuras and 566 Fords — 655 real pre-purchase inspections. Updated Oct 27, 2026.
?
How long do Acuras and Fords stay in good shape?
In our data, the average Acura dips below “decent” around ~115k mi; Ford around ~127k mi. Individual cars vary — get the one you’re buying inspected.
Buying a used Acura or Ford? Get a pre-purchase inspection before you pay.
Book an inspection

Based on 655 inspections · updated Oct 27, 2026